Assessment of Functional Independence in different levels of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients of Pakistani Population; A Cross-Sectional Survey: Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Patients of Pakistani Population

Maheen  Sarfraz; Hina  Shiren; Iram  Shafee; Safia  Firdous; Khadija  Liaquat Ali

doi:10.54393/pbmj.v5i3.351

Authors

Maheen Sarfraz Riphah College of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hina Shiren Royal College of Physiotherapy, Rahimyarkhan, Pakistan
Iram Shafee Avicenna Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Safia Firdous Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
Khadija Liaquat Ali Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i3.351

Keywords:

Spinal cord injuries, Functional independence, FIM score, Rehabilitation

Abstract

Spinal Cord injury (SCI) is a serious public health problem as it not only causes serious functional impairment in the individual but also affects the family and social circle of the patient. The main objective of the study was to investigate the level of functional independence in different levels of SCI patients in Pakistani population. We hypothesized that different levels of SCI experience different levels of functional independence. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional survey was designed, and data was collected from Lahore General Hospital, Ghurki Hospital, and Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. 52 patients suffering from acute spinal cord injury were enrolled in study by using convenient sampling technique. Overall health status of patients was measured using functional independence measure (FIM) tool. Results: Total 52 patients were assessed in this study. Out of which 50% injuries were reported at cervical level, 15% injuries were reported at thoracic level and 34% were reported at lumbar level. Percentage of males suffering from SCI (62%) was higher than female (38%). The lowest functional independence level was recorded for cervical injury (FIM score: 40), moderate for thoracic injury (FIM score: 84) and maximum for lumbar injury (FIM score: 102). Conclusion: Within the studied population, the percentage of cervical injuries was more than thoracic and lumbar. Gender proportion in traumatic spinal cord injury showed that men were more prone to injury as compared to female. However, functional independence was associated with level of SCI injury as cervical injuries patients were least independent while lumbar injury patients had high functional independence.

References

Sadowsky C, Volshteyn O, Schultz L and McDonald J. Spinal cord injury. Disability and rehabilitation. 2002; 24: 680-7.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110110640

Massetti J and Stein DM. Spinal cord injury. Neurocritical Care for the Advanced Practice Clinician. Springer, 2018, p. 269-88.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48669-7_15

Noonan VK, Fingas M, Farry A, et al. Incidence and prevalence of spinal cord injury in Canada: a national perspective. Neuroepidemiology. 2012; 38: 219-26.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000336014

da Silva GA, Schoeller SD, Gelbcke FL, Carvalho Z and Silva DEMJ. FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF PEOPLE WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY: USE OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE-FIM1. Enfermagem. 2012; 21: 929-36.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000400025

Adriaansen JJ, van Asbeck FW, Tepper M, et al. Bladder-emptying methods, neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and impact on quality of life in people with long-term spinal cord injury. The journal of spinal cord medicine. 2017; 40: 43-53.

https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000056

Sekhon LH and Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001; 26: S2-S12.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200112151-00002

Post M. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. 2014; 20: 167-80.

https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2003-167

Boakye M, Leigh BC and Skelly AC. Quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury: comparisons with other populations. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2012; 17: 29-37.

https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1252

Barbetta D, Cassemiro L and Assis M. The experience of using the scale of functional independence measure in individuals undergoing spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Brazil. Spinal cord. 2014; 52: 276-81.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2013.179

Hall KM, Cohen ME, Wright J, Call M and Werner P. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1999; 80: 1471-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90260-5

Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1996; 77: 1101-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90130-6

Pickett GE, Campos-Benitez M, Keller JL and Duggal N. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada. Spine. 2006; 31: 799-805.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000207258.80129.03

Bilal H and Ur-Rahman M. The Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa, Pakistan from 2008 to 2012: JRCRS-2016; 4 (1): 30-34. Journal Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences. 2016; 4: 30-4.

Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993-2012. Jama. 2015; 313: 2236-43.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.6250