https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/issue/feed Pakistan BioMedical Journal 2026-10-14T15:09:23+00:00 The Editorial Staff editor@pakistanbmj.com Open Journal Systems <p>Title of Journal: <strong>Pakistan Biomedical Journal (ISSN Online: 2709-2798, Print: 2709-278X)</strong></p> <p>Frequency: <strong>Monthly</strong></p> <p><strong>Description:</strong></p> <p><strong>Pakistan BioMedical Journal (PBMJ)</strong> is an Official Journal of "Rotogen Biotech (Pvt) Ltd<strong>"</strong> and is being funded and supported by Rotogen Biotech (Pvt) Ltd. Pakistan Biomedical Journal (PBMJ) is an open access, double blind peer-reviewed journal. </p> <p><strong>Aim &amp; Scope</strong></p> <p>The Pakistan BioMedical Journal (PBMJ) covers a diverse range of disciplines crucial to healthcare and academia. This includes Public Health, Clinical Sciences, Dentistry, Nursing, Medical/Health Professions Education, and Biological Sciences related to human health. By embracing such a wide spectrum of topics, PBMJ aims to serve as a comprehensive platform for the dissemination of research and knowledge, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and advancements in understanding human health and well-being.</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Accreditation:</strong></span></p> <p><strong>Approved by Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (Result Pending)</strong></p> <p><strong>Approved by Pakistan Medical and Dental Council till 31st December, 2026</strong></p> <p><strong>Fee &amp; Subscription Charges</strong></p> <p>Article Processing Fee: 5000 (W.e.f 1st Jan-25) <strong>(Non-Refundable)</strong></p> <p>Article Publication Fee (National) Rs 30000 / Article</p> <p>Article Publication Fee (International ) 200 USD / Article</p> <p>Printed Version ((Selected Articles on Authors Request): Rs 2500/per copy (For InLand Delivery)</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Annual Subscription for Printed Versions</strong></span></p> <p>For Institutes: Rs 20,000/ Annually</p> <p>Single Copy (Selected Articles): Rs 2500/-</p> <p><strong>Bank Details</strong></p> <p>Account Title: Rotogen Biotech (Pvt) Ltd</p> <p>Bank Name: Bank Alfalah</p> <p>IBAN: PK33ALFH0042001008325623</p> <p>Account # 00421008325623</p> <p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Waiver Policy</strong></span></p> <p>If an author has no funds to pay such charges, he may request for full or partial waiver of publication fees. The decision may however vary from case to case.</p> <p>We do not want charges to prevent the publication of worthy material.</p> <p><strong><u>Submissions</u></strong></p> <p><span style="font-size: 0.875rem;">Submission are welcome and may be submitted here: <a href="mailto:editor@pakistanbmj.com">editor@pakistanbmj.com</a></span></p> https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1422 Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced FLAIR MRI in the Diagnosis of Meningitis, Keeping CSF Analysis as the Gold Standard 2026-10-09T10:59:15+00:00 Aymen Shahab draymenshahab@gmail.com Faria Maqsood drfariamaqsood92@gmail.com Mehreen Khan drmehreen618@gmail.com Ayesha Waheed ayeshawaheed979@yahoo.com Nayab Motasim umotasim84@gmail.com Shanza Ijaz shanzaijaz@gmail.com <p>Meningitis is a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the meninges that requires prompt diagnosis to reduce neurological complications and mortality. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis remains the reference standard, but contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (CE-FLAIR MRI) may improve detection of meningeal enhancement and complement CSF assessment. <strong>Objective:</strong> To determine the diagnostic accuracy of CE-FLAIR MRI for meningitis using CSF analysis as the reference standard. <strong>Methods:</strong> This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study included 103 patients with suspected meningitis at MTI/Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from May to November 2022. All participants underwent CE-FLAIR MRI and CSF analysis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a 2 × 2 contingency table, and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. <strong>Results:</strong> Among 103 patients, 61 were CSF-positive, and 42 were CSF-negative. CE-FLAIR MRI identified 55 true-positive, 34 true-negative, 8 false-positive, and 6 false-negative cases. Sensitivity was 90.2% (95% CI: 80.2–95.4), specificity 81.0% (66.7–90.0), PPV 87.3% (76.9–93.4), NPV 85.0% (70.9–92.9), and overall accuracy 86.4% (78.5–91.7). CE-FLAIR MRI showed a strong association with CSF-confirmed meningitis (Cramer’s V = 0.717, p&lt;0.001). <strong>Conclusions:</strong> CE-FLAIR MRI showed good diagnostic performance and may serve as a useful non-invasive adjunct to CSF analysis in suspected meningitis; however, it should not replace CSF assessment where lumbar puncture is feasible.</p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1473 Comparison of Propofol Dexmedetomidine with Propofol Ketamine for Anesthesia during Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography 2026-10-13T15:09:05+00:00 Muhammad Talha Shamim talhashamim95@gmail.com Maham Khalid mahamkhalid30@gmail.com Muhammad Furqan Zahid furqanzahidch@gmail.com Adeel Younis dradeel125@gmail.com Khalid Abaid Ullah khalidabaidullah@yahoo.com Hafiz Muhammad Danish Farooq fa434056@gmail.com <p>Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a complex endoscopic procedure. The combination of Propofol with dexmedetomidine or ketamine is commonly used, but the comparative efficacy and safety of these combinations remain a topic of debate. <strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of propofol-dexmedetomidine versus propofol-ketamine for anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP. <strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted at Fatima Memorial Hospital from 20 December 2025 to 20 June 2026. Consecutive sampling was used to select 150 ERCP patients, who were further allocated to two groups: propofol-dexmedetomidine (n=75) and propofol-ketamine (n=75). Baseline characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, total propofol dose, recovery time, adverse events, and satisfaction scores were measured. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, and the p-value ≤0.05 was regarded as significant. <strong>Results: </strong>Propofol-dexmedetomidine achieved greater reductions in intra-procedural heart rate and BP (all p&lt;0.001), shorter recovery time (p&lt;0.001), and higher endoscopist and patient satisfaction (p=0.006 and p=0.018). A higher incidence of bradycardia (p=0.005) and hypotension (p=0.016) was seen with dexmedetomidine, while more propofol was used with propofol-ketamine (p&lt;0.001) and more excessive secretions (p=0.031) and agitation/emergence reactions (p=0.034). There was no significant difference in crude incidence of ≥1 MAE (p=0.051). <strong>Conclusions: </strong>Propofol-dexmedetomidine allowed for better procedural conditions and satisfaction, and propofol-ketamine allowed for better hemodynamic stability. Each patient should be assessed based on their risk profile and the requirements for their procedure.</p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1474 Role of Triphasic Computed Tomography in Evaluation of Hepatic Lesions: Comparative Cross-Sectional Study 2026-10-14T15:09:23+00:00 Mian Waheed Ahmad drmianwaheedahmad@gmail.com Sidra Ghaffar sidra_ghaffar89@yahoo.com Maryam Anayat mariyamanaiyat7771@gmail.com Muqadas Fatima muqadas183@gmail.com Zahid Raheem Shah zahid.gilani.shah@gmail.com <p>Focal hepatic lesions may be benign or malignant and can be difficult to characterize with ultrasound alone. Multiphase contrast-enhanced computed tomography provides dynamic information about lesion vascularity and enhancement, which can improve lesion characterization and guide further management. <strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the diagnostic accuracy of triphasic computed tomography (TPCT) in differentiating benign from malignant hepatic lesions using fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) as the reference standard. <strong>Methods: </strong>A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 136 patients with focal hepatic lesions. All patients underwent triphasic computed tomography (TPCT), and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was used as the reference standard. TPCT findings were compared with FNAC results to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall diagnostic accuracy. <strong>Results: </strong>Out of 140 enrolled patients, 136 had complete data available for the final analysis. TPCT classified 31 (22.8%) lesions as benign and 105 (77.2%) as malignant, whereas FNAC classified 29 (21.3%) as benign and 107 (78.7%) as malignant. The contingency table showed 104 true positives, 28 true negatives, 1 false positive, and 3 false negatives. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 97.1%. <strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this single-centre cohort, TPCT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing benign from malignant focal hepatic lesions. Its high sensitivity and specificity support its value as a non-invasive diagnostic modality, although findings should be validated in larger multi-centre studies.</p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1475 Comparison of Early Outcome of Arteriovenous Fistula for Dialysis Access among Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Prospective Observational Study 2026-10-14T15:09:16+00:00 Ismail Akbar 1@gmail.com Danish Naveed drdanishnaveed1@gmail.com Adnan Tahir 2@gmail.com Mehvish Nazneen 3@gmail.com Hina Ismail 4@gmail.com <p>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, but early maturation failure and postoperative complications remain important concerns. Diabetes mellitus may affect vascular remodeling and has been considered a potential risk factor for adverse AVF outcomes, though evidence remains inconsistent. <strong>Objective:</strong> To compare the early outcomes of AVF creation for hemodialysis access among diabetic and non-diabetic patients. <strong>Methods:</strong> This comparative prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Ayub Teaching Hospital, from April 2025 to March 2026. A total of 254 patients undergoing AVF creation were included through non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were grouped according to diabetic status. Early outcomes assessed included AVF maturation, thrombosis, infection, hematoma formation, and AVF failure. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and independent-samples t-test, with p≤0.050 considered significant. <strong>Results:</strong> Mean age was 48.3 ± 17.8 years; 117 (46.1%) patients were diabetic, and 137 (53.9%) were non-diabetic. Early maturation occurred in 56.4% of diabetic and 54.7% of non-diabetic patients (p=0.742). Thrombosis (45.3% vs 44.5%, p=0.881), infection (49.6% vs 53.3%, p=0.571), and AVF failure (46.2% vs 46.7%, p=0.932) were comparable between groups. Hypertension, smoking, and radiocephalic fistula type showed significant association with AVF failure. <strong>Conclusions:</strong> Early AVF outcomes were comparable between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Diabetes was not significantly associated with poorer early AVF outcomes in this cohort.</p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1412 Preterm Birth Frequency among Women with Risk Factors Presenting at 28–34 Weeks and Receiving Oral Micronized Progesterone: A Prospective Single-Arm Study 2026-10-14T05:43:24+00:00 Fareeha Khaliq Khan drfareeha@hotmail.com Shahnillah Zafar dr.shahnilah@hotmail.com Fariha Arshad anjumfariha36@gmail.com Aneeta Tajammul aneetatajammul@gmail.com Sadaf Khurshid sadafkhurshid1@gmail.com Sanum Asif drsanum@yahoo.com <p>Preterm birth (PTB) remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Evidence regarding oral progesterone in women presenting with risk factors later in gestation remains limited.<strong> Objectives: </strong>To determine the frequency of PTB before 37 completed weeks among women presenting at 28–34 weeks with risk factors for PTB and receiving oral micronized progesterone.<strong> Methods: </strong>This prospective single-arm study included 100 women aged 18–40 years with singleton pregnancies at 28–34 weeks and a previous spontaneous PTB, cervical length &lt;25 mm, or both. Oral micronized progesterone 100 mg was given twice daily until 36+6 weeks or delivery. Participants were followed until delivery. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0. Quantitative variables were summarized as median and interquartile range. Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. Mann–Whitney U and Fisher exact tests were used where appropriate. <strong>Results: </strong>Median age was 30.0 years and median cervical length was 23.4 mm. PTB occurred in 15 (15.0%) women (95% CI: 8.6–23.5), while 85 (85.0%) delivered at term. Five (5.0%) delivered before 34 weeks and 10 (10.0%) at 34 to &lt;37 weeks. Median gestational age at delivery was 38.2 weeks. Compliance was good in 93 (93.0%) women. Twenty women reported adverse effects, with one recorded adverse effect per affected participant.<strong> Conclusion: </strong>PTB occurred in 15.0% of women receiving oral micronized progesterone, while 85.0% reached term gestation<strong>.</strong></p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal https://pakistanbmj.com/journal/index.php/pbmj/article/view/1465 Role of Academia and Research Institutions in Advancing Indigenous Vaccine Development 2026-10-09T10:59:14+00:00 Saira Afzal drsairaafzal@kemu.edu.pk Muhammad Maaz Arif 1@gmail.com <p>Research and academic institutions play a vital role in advancing the development of indigenous vaccines. The self-driven research and production of vaccines that suit national or regional public health needs reduces reliance on imports and enhances self-reliance, which is particularly important for developing countries [1].</p> <p>These institutions contribute at many stages of the development of vaccines. Their work includes pathogen isolation and characterization, antigen discovery, and the development of platform technologies, including inactivated, recombinant, and subunit approaches. Their involvement may extend to early-stage clinical trials and immunological data that support vaccine research. Collaboration with industry provides another way by which vaccine research can progress from laboratory development to large-scale manufacturing [2].</p> <p>Training of candidates for vaccine research encompasses skills development with a focus on affordable biopharmaceuticals and vaccines. Universities and research institutions can contribute in terms of discovery, clinical trial infrastructure, and specialized scientific expertise. Collaboration between academia, industry, and government can further support the movement of research towards product development [1].</p> <p>Comparable roles for public research institutions can be seen in other countries. In Brazil, institutions such as Fiocruz (Bio-Manguinhos), together with partnerships involving universities, have supported technology transfer, local production of COVID-19 vaccines, and efforts to develop indigenous vaccine platforms, including mRNA approaches. These activities have also been linked to wider efforts to reduce dependence on external vaccine supply. In other low- and middle-income countries, research institutions contribute to vaccine research, scientific training, and collaborations intended to address pathogen strains and logistical needs relevant to their own settings [3].</p> <p>For Pakistan, strengthening domestic vaccine production is particularly relevant because of the country’s heavy dependence on imported vaccines. Approximately 90–95% of the vaccines used in the national immunization program are reported to be imported. Such dependence may increase exposure to global supply disruptions, higher procurement costs, and potential vaccine shortages during pandemics or other emergencies [4].</p> <p>Overall, academic and research institutions are particularly important during the early stages of vaccine development, when evidence must be generated for subsequent regulatory and policy decisions, including those made through bodies such as India’s NTAGI. Academic and research institutions also contribute to training the next generation of vaccinologists and to maintaining the scientific capacity needed to respond to emerging infectious threats. Academic research alone, however, is not sufficient. Its contribution to indigenous vaccine development depends on continued funding, supportive policy, and effective links with industry. Together, these factors can strengthen domestic vaccine capacity, improve access to vaccines, and support preparedness for future public health emergencies.</p> 2026-09-30T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2026 Pakistan BioMedical Journal