Linguistic Reliability & Validity of Urdu Version of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Authors

  • Amber Shabbir Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Imran Dr. Akhtar Saeed College of Nursing, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Kamran Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Ahmad Wassi Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International University Faisalabad, Pakistan
  • Haroon Amin Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Asma Balqees Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Qurat ul Ain Department of Physical Therapy, The Limit Institute of Health Sciences Sahiwal, Pakistan
  • Hira Tariq Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences, Islamabad Medical & Dental College, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Mahtab Ahmad Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Riphah International College Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
  • Irfan Ullah Department of Life Sciences, School of Science, University of Management and Technology (UMT), Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.627

Keywords:

Chronic low back pain, LBP, Validity, Reliability, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (U-RMDQ)

Abstract

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a self-administered tool that produces reliable measurements for drawing implications about disability. Urdu form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (U-RMDQ) is considered apprehensive for the population of Pakistan. Furthermore, the Urdu version of this tool is consistent in reliability, validity & content continuity with the English original version. Objective: The aims of the current study were to assess the reliability, validity & utility of the Urdu form of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) in participants with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Methods: This study design was qualitative tool validation. The sampling technique employed was non-random convenience sampling with 100 individuals including both females and males within the age of 20 years to 70 years. Out of 100, 25 were healthy & 75 were patients Measurements were taken at baseline followed by another measurement after 24 hours. The study was completed in three stages; content validity was evaluated through the content validity index in the first stage, a pilot study was run to evaluate reliability & validity in the second stage followed by an evaluation of patients presenting with low back pain using Urdu version of (U-RMDQ) in the third stage. Data were collected through the Urdu version of the (U-RMDQ). Afterward, IBM SPSS version 25.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: -retest reliability depicted with Intra-class Correlation Coefficient was 0.684 for healthy individuals while 0.998 for participants with non-specific chronic LBP. The outcomes clearly express the tool reliability for the assessment of disability in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. An Independent t-test was employed to check the different validity, results showed the significant differences in means of all variables between both groups thereby producing <.05 two-tailed significance of all variables. After factor analysis of samples of 100 patients, Kaiser-Meyer Olkin (KMO) was 0.872 & p-value <0.05 showed the significance of the test. Five variables in (U-RMDQ) were responsible for variance in data. Conclusion: The study concluded the Urdu version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate disability associated with chronic non-specific low back pain.

References

Floyd RT, Thompson CW. Manual of structural kinesiology: McGraw-Hill New York, NY; 2009.

Burns BD. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation and treatment of low back pain in the emergency department. Emergency medicine practice. 2013;2.

Akizuki S, Mow VC, Müller F, Pita JC, Howell DS, Manicourt DH. Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 1986; 4(4):379-92. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100040401.

Bryndal A, Majchrzycki M, Grochulska A, Glowinski S, Seremak-Mrozikiewicz A. Risk factors associated with low back pain among A group of 1510 pregnant women. Journal of personalized medicine. 2020 Jun; 10(2):51. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020051.

Koes BW, Van Tulder M, Lin C-WC, Macedo LG, McAuley J, Maher C. An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care. European Spine Journal. 2010 Dec; 19(12):2075-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y.

Schäfer A, Hall T, Briffa K. Classification of low back-related leg pain—a proposed patho-mechanism-based approach. Manual therapy. 2009 Apr; 14(2):222-30. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.10.003.

Manusov EG. Evaluation and diagnosis of low back pain. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice. 2012 Sep; 39(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.06.003.

Stroker R. Legal and ethical issues. A handbook for new parole board members: Part of a resource kit for new parole board members Retrieved from http://www apaintl org/documents/CEPPParoleHandbook pdf. 2003.

Hegmann KT, Travis R, Andersson GB, Belcourt RM, Carragee EJ, Donelson R, et al. Non-invasive and minimally invasive management of low back disorders. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2020 Mar; 62(3):e111-e138. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001812.

Al Torairi MN, Aljowair MFF, Shamsi S, Khan MS. Effect Of Hydrotherapy And Physiotherapy Exercises On Low Back Pain: Horizon Books (A Division of Ignited Minds Edutech P Ltd); 2021.

Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain: Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Mar; 8(2):141-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004.

Truchon M, Fillion L. Biopsychosocial determinants of chronic disability and low-back pain: a review. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 2000; 10(2):117-42.

Garg A, Pathak H, Churyukanov MV, Uppin RB, Slobodin TM. Low back pain: critical assessment of various scales. European Spine Journal. 2020 Mar; 29(3):503-518. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06279-5.

Sánchez-Zuriaga D, López-Pascual J, Garrido-Jaén D, de Moya MFP, Prat-Pastor J. Reliability and validity of a new objective tool for low back pain functional assessment. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul; 36(16):1279-88. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f471d8.

Payares K, Lugo LH, Restrepo A. Validation of the roland morris questionnaire in colombia to evaluate disability in low back pain. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jul; 40(14):1108-14. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000963.

Mbada CE, Idowu OA, Ogunjimi OR, Ayanniyi O, Orimolade EA, Oladiran AB, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Yoruba version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Apr; 42(7):497-503. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001899.

Takara KS, Alamino Pereira de Viveiro L, Moura PA, Marques Pasqual A, Pompeu JE. Roland-Morris disability questionnaire is bidimensional and has 16 items when applied to community-dwelling older adults with low back pain. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2022 Jul: 1-7. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2096127.

Lee JS, Lee DH, Suh KT, Kim JI, Lim JM, Goh TS. Validation of the Korean version of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire. European Spine Journal. 2011 Dec; 20(12):2115-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1788-4.

Mâaroufi H, Benbouazza K, Faïk A, Bahiri R, Lazrak N, Abouqal R, et al. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Moroccan version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun; 32(13):1461-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060a63d.

Scharovsky A, Pueyrredón M, Craig D, Rivas ME, Converso G, Pueyrredón JH, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Argentinean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May; 33(12):1391-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318173dc8f.

Kim K-E, Lim J-Y. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for use in low back pain. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2011; 24(2):83-8. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2011-0278.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.627
Published: 2022-07-31

How to Cite

Shabbir, A. ., Imran, M. ., Kamran, M. ., Wassi, A., Amin, H. ., Balqees, A. ., Ain, Q. ul ., Tariq, H. ., Ahmad, M. ., & Ullah, I. . (2022). Linguistic Reliability & Validity of Urdu Version of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 5(7), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.627

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3