Effects of Action Observation Treatment Upper Limb Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients
Action Observation Treatment on Upper Limb Motor Function
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i1.182Abstract
The rate of cerebrovascular accident is keep on increasing in Pakistan which cause major disability in affected person. In developed countries it has been reported that an action observation treatment for rehabilitation, promotes motor function of upper limb in stroke population.Objective: To find out effects of action observation treatment on upper limb motor functions of chronic stroke patients.Study Design: A randomized control trial with registered number NCT05084820.Place and Duration of study:Fourteen chronic stroke patients were taken from Umer hospital and Riphah rehab center Lahore. Total duration of study was 6 months.Materials and method:A randomized control trial was done containing total 14 chronic stroke patients. Patients in experimental group were given action observationtreatment three days per week for one month along with conventional physiotherapy treatment. Patients in conventional group, received strengthening exercises, reach and grasp of hand, stretch of hand muscles. Modified Barthel Index was used to measure function of upper limb and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE) for assessment of motor function. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS 21.Results: There were significant difference in MBI and FMA-UE score, P value was <0.05, but sensation and joint pain from FMA-UE tool P value was >0.05 which was non-significant.Conclusion:Action observation treatment together with conventional treatment was an effective treatment approach on improving motor function of upper limb in chronic stroke patients.
References
Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Kannel WB. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(3):312-8.
https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.22.3.312
Rudd AG, Bowen A, Young G, James MA. National clinical guideline for stroke: 2016. Clinical Medicine. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-154
Buccino G, Arisi D, Gough P, Aprile D, Ferri C, Serotti L, et al. Improving upper limb motor functions through action observation treatment: a pilot study in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2012;54(9):822-8.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x
Kilner JM, Lemon RN. What we know currently about mirror neurons. Current biology. 2013;23(23):R1057-R62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.051
Brown BJ, Kim S, Saunders H, Bachmann C, Thompson J, Ropar D, et al. A neural basis for contagious yawning. Current Biology. 2017;27(17):2713-7. e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.07.062
Buccino G. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014;369(1644):20130185.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0185
Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A, Sale P, Mancuso M, Buccino G. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):517-23.
Keci A, Tani K, Xhema J. Role of Rehabilitation in Neural Plasticity. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2019;7(9):1540.
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.295
Wairagkar M, McCrindle R, Robson H, Meteyard L, Sperrin M, Smith A, et al. MaLT-combined motor and language therapy tool for brain injury patients using Kinect. Methods of information in medicine. 2017;56(2):127-37.
https://doi.org/10.3414/ME16-02-0015
Mao H, Li Y, Tang L, Chen Y, Ni J, Liu L, et al. Effects of mirror neuron system‐based training on rehabilitation of stroke patients. Brain and Behavior. 2020;10(8):e01729.
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1729
Plata-Bello J. The Study of Action Observation Therapy in Neurological Diseases: A Few Technical Considerations. Neurological Physical Therapy: IntechOpen; 2017. p. 1-13.
Mao H, Li Y, Tang L, Chen Y, Ni J, Liu L, et al. Effects of mirror neuron system‐based training on rehabilitation of stroke patients. Brain and Behavior. 2020;10(8):e01729.
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1729
Keci A, Tani K, Xhema J. Role of Rehabilitation in Neural Plasticity. Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences. 2019;7(9):1540.
https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.295
Keller J, Štětkářová I, Macri V, Kühn S, Pětioký J, Gualeni S, et al. Virtual reality-based treatment for regaining upper extremity function induces cortex grey matter changes in persons with acquired brain injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2020;17(1):1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00754-7
McGurgan IJ, Ziai WC, Werring DJ, Salman RA-S, Parry-Jones AR. Acute intracerebral haemorrhage: diagnosis and management. Practical Neurology. 2021;21(2):128-36.
https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2020-002763
Mao H, Li Y, Tang L, Chen Y, Ni J, Liu L, et al. Effects of mirror neuron system‐based training on rehabilitation of stroke patients. Brain and Behavior. 2020;10(8):e01729.
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1729
Donkor ES. Stroke in the century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke research and treatment. 2018;2018.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3238165
Habibi-Koolaee M, Shahmoradi L, Niakan Kalhori SR, Ghannadan H, Younesi E. Prevalence of Stroke Risk Factors and Their Distribution Based on Stroke Subtypes in Gorgan: A Retrospective Hospital-Based Study-2015-2016. Neurology research international. 2018;2018.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2709654
King D, Wittenberg R, Patel A, Quayyum Z, Berdunov V, Knapp M. The future incidence, prevalence and costs of stroke in the UK. Age and ageing. 2020;49(2):277-82.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afz163
Rudd AG, Bowen A, Young G, James MA. National clinical guideline for stroke: 2016. Clinical Medicine. 2017.
https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-154
Pan A, Sun Q, Okereke OI, Rexrode KM, Hu FB. Depression and risk of stroke morbidity and mortality: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Jama. 2011;306(11):1241-9.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1282
Sharif F, Ghulam S, Malik AN, Saeed Q. Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES) versus conventional electrical stimulation in gait rehabilitation of patients with stroke. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2017;27(11):703-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Pakistan BioMedical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments editor@pakistanbmj.com