Effects OF Mulligan’s Mobilization With Movement On First Rib To Reduce Pain And Improve Cervical Rotation In Mechanical Neck Dysfunction
Mulligan’s Mobilization In Mechanical Neck Dysfunction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v4i2.99Keywords:
Neck pain, range of motion, mechanical, cervical rotationAbstract
Mechanical Neck Pain(MNP) is a term used to describe pain that results from stress or strain on the structures of the vertebral column. Factors such as alteration in the anatomical structures, sprain or strain of the muscles or ligaments, and adaptation to a faulty posture can result in First rib dysfunction has been identified as a potential cause for faulty dynamic, static, traumatic or congenital factors, may contribute to the development of elevated first rib dysfunction. Objective: Was to determine the effects of Mulligan’s mobilization with movement on first rib to reduce pain and improve cervical rotation in mechanical neck dysfunction. Material and methods: This study Quasi-experimental trial was done at PT CARE MM Alam road Lahore. The study was completed within the time duration of six months (July-Dec 2019) after the approval of synopsis. A total of 26 cases (13 in each group) were divided into 2 groups. Group A and Group B were treated with conventional exercise program and with Mulligan’s mobilization with movement on first rib and conventional exercise program only respectively. Bubble inclinometer and NPRS tools were used to measure cervical rotation and Pain respectively. Data analysis was done by SPSS 21.Results: The mean change in NPRS was statistically higher in group-B (5.46 ± 0.78) as compared to group-A (2.62 ± 0.87), p-value < 0.001. The mean change in cervical rotation (ROM) was statistically higher in group-B (17.46 ± 5.19) as compared to group-A (31.23 ± 4), p-value < 0.001. Conclusion: It is concluded that Mulligan’s mobilization with movement on first rib and conventional exercise program had statistically significant change in reduction of pain and had higher improvement in cervical rotation (ROM) right and left. Hence, by combining conventional treatment and Mulligan’s mobilization , maximum clinical benefits to reduce pain and improve cervical rotation can be attained in mechanical neck dysfunction
References
Merskey HE. Classification of chronic pain: Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Pain. 1986. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3461421/
Vicenzino B, Paungmali A, Teys P. Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: current concepts from a critical review of literature. Manual therapy. 2007; 12(2):98-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2006.07.012
Stathopoulos N, Dimitriadis Z, Koumantakis GA. Effectiveness of Mulligan's mobilization with movement techniques on pain and disability of peripheral joints: a systematic review with meta-analysis between 2008-2017. Physiotherapy. 2019;105(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2018.10.001
Aker PD, Gross AR, Goldsmith CH, Peloso P. Conservative management of mechanical neck pain: systematic overview and meta-analysis. Bmj. 1996; 313(7068):1291-6.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1291
Bogduk N, McGuirk B. Management of acute and chronic neck pain: an evidence-based approach: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. https://www.elsevier.com/books/management-of-acute-and-chronic-neck-pain/bogduk/978-0-444-50846-1
Heintz MM, Hegedus EJ. Multimodal management of mechanical neck pain using a treatment based classification system. J. Manu. Manipu. Ther. 2008;16(4):217-24.
https://doi.org/10.1179/106698108790818260
Stump JL, Redwood D. The use and role of sport chiropractors in the national football league: a short report. J. manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 2002;25(3):A2-A5.
https://doi.org/10.1067/mmt.2002.122326
Brønfort G, Nilsson N, Haas M, Evans RL, Goldsmith CH, Assendelft WJ, et al. Non‐invasive physical treatments for chronic/recurrent headache. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2004(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001878.pub2
Delgado-Gil JA, Prado-Robles E, Rodrigues-de-Souza DP, Cleland JA, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alburquerque-Sendín F. Effects of mobilization with movement on pain and range of motion in patients with unilateral shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J. Manipu. Physio. Therap. 2015; 38(4):245-52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.12.008
Di Fabio RP, Boissonnault W. Physical therapy and health-related outcomes for patients with common orthopaedic diagnoses. J. Ortho. Spo. Phy. Ther. 1998;27(3):219-30.
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1998.27.3.219
González-Iglesias J, Fernandez-De-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, del Rosario Gutiérrez-Vega M. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J. Ortho. Spo. Phy. Ther. 2009;39(1):20-7.
https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2914
Elliott J, Jull G, Noteboom JT, Darnell R, Galloway G, Gibbon WW. Fatty infiltration in the cervical extensor muscles in persistent whiplash-associated disorders: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Spine. 2006;31(22):E847-E55.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000240841.07050.34
Reid SA, Rivett DA, Katekar MG, Callister R. Sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) are an effective treatment for cervicogenic dizziness. Manual therapy. 2008;13(4):357-66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2007.03.006
Yao M, Sun Y-l, Dun R-l, Lan T-y, Li J-l, Lee HJ, et al. Is manipulative therapy clinically necessary for relief of neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chinese J. Integrative Med. 2017;23(7):543-54.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-016-2506-1
McLean SM, May S, Klaber-Moffett J, Sharp DM, Gardiner E. Risk factors for the onset of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. J. Epidem. Comm. Hlth. 2010;64(7):565-72.
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.090720
Young JL, Walker D, Snyder S, Daly K. Thoracic manipulation versus mobilization in patients with mechanical neck pain: a systematic review. J. Man. Manipu. Thera. 2014;22(3):141-53. https://doi.org/10.1179/2042618613Y.0000000043
Guzman J, Hurwitz EL, Carroll LJ, Haldeman S, Côté P, Carragee EJ, et al. A new conceptual model of neck pain: linking onset, course, and care: the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. J. Man. Manipu. Thera. 2009;32(2):S17-S28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181643efb
Spitzer WO. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining" whiplash" and its management. Spine. 1995;20:1S-73S.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199504151-00004
Ali A, Shakil-ur-Rehman S, Sibtain F. The efficacy of sustained natural apophyseal glides with and without isometric exercise training in non-specific neck pain. Pak. J. Med. Sci. 2014;30(4):872. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.304.5148
Treede R-D. The International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: as valid in 2018 as in 1979, but in need of regularly updated footnotes. Pain reports. 2018;3(2).
https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000643
Fishbain DA, Cole B, Lewis JE, Gao J. What is the evidence that neuropathic pain is present in chronic low back pain and soft tissue syndromes? An evidence-based structured review. Pain Medicine. 2014;15(1):4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12229
Andrews DP, Odland-Wolf KB, May J, Baker R, Nasypany A, Dinkins EM. Immediate and short-term effects of mulligan concept positional sustained natural apophyseal glides on an athletic young-adult population classified with mechanical neck pain: an exploratory investigation. J. Man. Manipu. Thera. 2018;26(4):203-11.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2018.1460965
Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B, Sas S, Karartı C, Ceylan I. The effect of mulligan mobilization technique in older adults with neck pain: A randomized controlled, double-blind study. Pain Research and Management. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2856375
Prayerna B, SuBBiah K, antony Leo aSSer P, MiLaneSe S. Effectiveness of Mulligan's Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) over First Rib in Reducing Pain and Improving Cervical Rotation in Individuals with Mechanical Neck Dysfunction. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research. 2019;13(3). https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/39626.12733
Hussain SI, Ahmad A, Amjad F, Shafi T, Shahid HA. Effectiveness of natural apophyseal glides versus grade I and II Maitland mobilization in non specific neck pain. Annals of King Edward Med. Uni. 2016;22(1):23-. https://doi.org/10.21649/akemu.v22i1.792
Masaracchio M, Kirker K, States R, Hanney WJ, Liu X, Kolber M. Thoracic spine manipulation for the management of mechanical neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2019;14(2):e0211877. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211877
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Pakistan BioMedical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal and all the published articles / items are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. For comments editor@pakistanbmj.com