Anthropometric Characteristics of Pakistan Rugby Union Players and Differences in Anthropometric Characteristics of Forwards and Backs: Anthropometric Characteristics of Pakistan Rugby Union Players

Talib  Hussain; . Malia; Ayesha Alam; Mariam  Liaquat; Muhammad  Ali; Hajira  Anwer Javed

doi:10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.683

Authors

Talib Hussain DHQ Hospital, Pakpattan, Pakistan
. Malia Link Medical Center, Lahore
Ayesha Alam University of Lahore
Mariam Liaquat University of Lahore
Muhammad Ali University of Lahore
Hajira Anwer Javed Avicenna Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i7.683

Keywords:

Anthropometric Characteristics, Physical Characteristics, Rugby Union Players, Pakistan

Abstract

Rugby is a contact sport played in Pakistan and worldwide at domestic, national and international level. Rugby union forwards and backs bear differences in anthropometric characteristics which are important while the assortment of players in the team. Objective: To describe anthropometric characteristics of Pakistan rugby union players and differences in anthropometric characteristics of forwards and backs. Methods: It was an observational study / cross sectional survey. Study was compiled at RCRS after data collection from players. Convenient sampling technique was used and 52 players were enrolled. Standiometer, Digital weight scale, Skinfold caliper and retractable steel tape was used for data collection. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0. Results: Mean weight of forwards was 94.3 ± 12.1 kg while that of backs was 71.2 ± 12.0 kg. The mean of the sum of the eight skinfold measurements of forwards was 150.9 ± 24.9 mm, and that of backs was 93.5 ± 33.9 mm. Mean body fat percentage of forwards was 19.2 ± 2.9 %, while backs have 12.4 ± 4.5 %. Mean fat mass of forwards was 18.2 ± 4.4 kg, and of backs was 9.1 ± 4.94 kg. Conclusions: Rugby union forwards and backs have significant differences in anthropometric characteristics with respect to body weight, skinfold thickness, girth measurement, and body fat percentage, all higher among forwards. No difference was observed in age and stretch stature.

References

Brazier J, Antrobus M, Stebbings GK, Day SH, Callus P, Erskine RM, et al. Anthropometric and Physiological Characteristics of Elite Male Rugby Athletes. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2020 Jun; 34(6):1790-1801. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002827

Union PR. history of Pakistan Rygby. [cited 2017 23 Febraury]; Retreived from: http://pakistanrugby.com/index.php/history/

Union ARF. History Of Asia Rugby. Asia Rugby Football Union; [cited 2017 23 febraury ]; Retreived from: https://www.asiarugby.com/about-asia-rugby/history/

Dawson P. Rugby positions. Austrailia2017 [cited 2017 Augest 19,]; Retreived from: http://www.rugbyhow.com/rugby-positions.html

Pheasant S, Haslegrave CM. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. CRC press; 2018 Dec 19.

Norton K, Olds T, Olive S, Craig N. Anthropometry and sports performance. Anthropometrica. 1996: 287-364.

Agar-Newman DJ, Goodale TL, Klimstra MD. Anthropometric and Physical Qualities of International Level Female Rugby Sevens Athletes Based on Playing Position. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2017 May; 31(5):1346-1352. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001167.

Darrall-Jones JD, Jones B, Till K. Anthropometric and Physical Profiles of English Academy Rugby Union Players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2015 Aug; 29(8):2086-96. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000872. PMID: 25647656.

Zemski AJ, Keating SE, Broad EM, Slater GJ. Longitudinal Changes in Body Composition Assessed Using DXA and Surface Anthropometry Show Good Agreement in Elite Rugby Union Athletes. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism. 2019 Jan; 29(1):24-31. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2018-0019

Vaz L, Kraak W, Batista M, Honório S, Miguel Fernandes H. Using Anthropometric Data and Physical Fitness Scores to Predict Selection in a National U19 Rugby Union Team. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021 Feb; 18(4):1499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041499

Yao X, Curtis C, Turner A, Bishop C, Austerberry A, Chavda S. Anthropometric Profiles and Physical Characteristics in Competitive Female English Premiership Rugby Union Players. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 2021 Sep; 16(9):1234-1241. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0017

Owen C, Till K, Phibbs P, Read DJ, Weakley J, Atkinson M, et al. A multidimensional approach to identifying the physical qualities of male English regional academy rugby union players; considerations of position, chronological age, relative age and maturation. European Journal of Sport Science. 2022 Feb: 1-11. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.2023658

Robyn AD, Berner K, Baumeister J, Louw Q. Anthropometric and physical performance profiles of elite junior rugby union players in the Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences. 2021 Dec; 27(4):501-15. doi: 10.37597/ajphes.2021.27.4.7

Blair MR, Scanlan AT, Lastella M, Ramsey C, Elsworthy N. The relationships between physical fitness attributes and match demands in rugby union referees officiating the 2019 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 2022 Jan; 22(1):183-94. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2022.2031527

Woodhouse LN, Tallent J, Patterson SD, Waldron M. International female rugby union players' anthropometric and physical performance characteristics: A five-year longitudinal analysis by individual positional groups. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2022 Feb; 40(4):370-378. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1993656

Patton DA, McIntosh AS, Denny G. A Review of the Anthropometric Characteristics, Grading and Dispensation of Junior and Youth Rugby Union Players in Australia. Sports Medicine. 2016 Aug; 46(8):1067-81. doi: 10.1007/s40279-016-0481-5

Liebenberg HL. Profiling of Positional Running Demands and Physical Characteristics of a Senior Varsity Cup Rugby Team: A Case Study. University of Johannesburg (South Africa); 2020.

Sekulic D, Pojskic H, Zeljko I, Pehar M, Modric T, Versic S, et al. Physiological and Anthropometric Determinants of Performance Levels in Professional Futsal. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021 Jan; 11:621763. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.621763

Silva VS and Vieira MF. International society for the advancement of kinanthropometry (Isak) global: International accreditation scheme of the competent anthropometrist. Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano. 2020 Apr; 22. doi: 10.1590/1980-0037.2020v22e70517

Varma BT and Parmar DJ. Comparison of results between the equations of body fat assessment by Jackson & Pollock of four sites, seven sites skin folds and girth measurement. 2016.

Gabbett TJ. Physiological and anthropometric characteristics of amateur rugby league players. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000 Aug; 34(4):303-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.34.4.303

Pramono HH and Nazrul-Hakim M. Physical evaluation of selected Malaysian national rugby players. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 2011;6(2).

Marwaha RK, Ghate V, Patel R. Performance Testing in Indian Rugby League Players. Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences. 2015; 3(1F):425-30.