Evaluation of Psychological Perceptions and Effectiveness of Health-Related Technologies in University Students

Psychological Perceptions and Effectiveness of Health-Related Technologies

Authors

  • Laiba Rana University Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Maria Aslam University Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hafsa Kamran University Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rubab Awan University Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Hafiza Areej Akram University Institute of Diet and Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i01.839

Keywords:

Health, Fitness, Wellness, Nutrition, Psychological Perceptions

Abstract

Young people are using wearable technology and mobile health applications in astronomically greater numbers to keep track of their adaption to healthy lifestyles. Objectives: To evaluate psychological perceptions, motivation levels, satisfaction levels and effectiveness of health-related technologies in university students. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done at the University of Lahore's Lahore Campus, for the duration of 4 months. Convenient sampling technique was used to calculate sample size.  A self-governing questionnaire was used to calculate data from 100 university students. Several statistical techniques, including cross tabulation and descriptive statistics, were used to examine the data using SPSS software. Results: Regarding psychological perceptions, 61% were conscious about their body image but 39% were not and 54% felt anxious after eating but 46% did not feel so. Regarding Motivation for physical activity, 37% were somewhat motivated, 30% a little bit motivated, 27% not at all and 6% were very well motivated. Regarding satisfaction levels, 52% were satisfied, 12% were highly satisfied and 18% were highly dissatisfied. Regarding effectiveness levels, 27% found these apps somewhat effective, 26% a little effective, 10% very effective and 37% not at all effective. Conclusion: A positive impact of these tools and technologies is hence found upon healthy lifestyle adaptation among university students

References

Eikey EV. Effects of diet and fitness apps on eating disorder behaviours: qualitative study. BJ Psych Open. 2021 Sep; 7(5): 1-9. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.1011.

Martínez-Pérez B, De La Torre-Díez I, López-Coronado M. Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations. Journal of Medical Systems. 2015 Jan; 39(1): 1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0181-3.

Decker L. The Relationship Between Insufficient Sleep and Obesity Related Health Complications in College Students (Doctoral dissertation, Middle Tennessee State University). 2013. Available at: http://jewlscholar.mtsu.edu/handle/mtsu/3531.

MedlinePlus. Dehydration. 2013. [Last cited at: 29th Feb 2016]. Available at: https://medlineplus.gov/dehydration.html.

Bridges M. Total Body Transformation: Lose Weight Fast-and Keep It Off Forever! Zinc Ink; 2014.

Mayo Clinic. Exercise Intensity: How to Measure It. 2014. [Last cited at: 1st Mar 2016]. Available at: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/fitness/in-depth/exercise-intensity/art-20046887.

Arboleda Carpio SL, Sohail S, Clark K, Fagan JM. Fitness Gadgets as a Form of Preventative Healthcare. 2016. doi:10.7282/T38W3GN0.

Powell JK. Beyond Fitness Trackers At CES: Tiny Wearable Biosensor Continuously Monitors Your Body Chemistry. 2016. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jenniferhicks/2016/01/07/beyond-fitness-trackers-at-ces-tiny-wearable-biosensor-continuously-monitors-your-body-chemistry/?sh=16e301de2348.

Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2020. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal. 2019 Nov; 23(6): 10-8. doi: 10.1249/FIT.0000000000000526.

Hajj-Boutros G, Landry-Duval MA, Comtois AS, Gouspillou G, Karelis AD. Wrist-Worn Devices for the Measurement of Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure: A Validation Study for the Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense. European Journal of Sport Science. 2021 Dec: 1-36. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.2023656.

Cho J, Lee HE, Quinlan M. Complementary relationships between traditional media and health apps among American college students. Journal of American College Health. 2015 May; 63(4): 248-57. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1015025.

Miller TW. Effectiveness of a wearable fitness tracker: practice implications in allied health--a single case study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2017 Jan; 15(1): 3. doi: 10.46743/1540-580X/2017.1604.

Gowin M, Cheney M, Gwin S, Franklin Wann T. Health and fitness app use in college students: a qualitative study. American Journal of Health Education. 2015 Jul; 46(4): 223-30. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2015.1044140.

Seiler R and Hüttermann M. E-Health, fitness trackers and wearables—Use among Swiss students. Advances in Business-Related Scientific Research Conference 2015 Proceedings. 2015 Mar: 1-12.

Henriksen A, Haugen Mikalsen M, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, et al. Using Fitness Trackers and Smartwatches to Measure Physical Activity in Research: Analysis of Consumer Wrist-Worn Wearables. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018 Mar; 20(3): e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9157.

Khan N, Marvel FA, Wang J, Martin SS. Digital health technologies to promote lifestyle change and adherence. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2017 Aug; 19(8): 1-2. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0560-4.

Kettunen E and Kari T. Can sport and wellness technology be my personal trainer? teenagers and digital coaching. In: Bled eConference 2018. University of Maribor Press. doi: 10.18690/978-961-286-170-4.32.

Lee RA and Jung ME. Evaluation of an mhealth app (destressify) on university students’ mental health: pilot trial. JMIR Mental Health. 2018 Jan; 5(1): e8324. doi: 10.2196/mental.8324.

Leung L and Chen C. E-health/m-health adoption and lifestyle improvements: Exploring the roles of technology readiness, the expectation-confirmation model, and health-related information activities. Telecommunications Policy. 2019 Jul; 43(6): 563-75. doi: 0.1016/j.telpol.2019.01.005.

Lin Y, Tudor-Sfetea C, Siddiqui S, Sherwani Y, Ahmed M, Eisingerich AB. Effective behavioral changes through a digital mHealth app: Exploring the impact of hedonic well-being, psychological empowerment and inspiration. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018 Jun; 6(6): e10024. doi: 10.2196/10024.

Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2014 May; 39(5): 356.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v6i01.839
Published: 2023-01-31

How to Cite

Rana, L. ., Aslam, M., Kamran, H. ., Awan, R. ., & Areej Akram, H. (2023). Evaluation of Psychological Perceptions and Effectiveness of Health-Related Technologies in University Students: Psychological Perceptions and Effectiveness of Health-Related Technologies. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 6(01), 09–13. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i01.839

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2